ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefijosh james tech net worth

FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. Thanks. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". I am just resuming my work on it. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. A lot of work to do. What exactly is the problem? And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. Seriously? I was able to create a Rufus image using "GPT for UEFI" and the latest Windows ISO (1709 updated in 12/2017). You signed in with another tab or window. You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. This means current is UEFI mode. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB Click Bootable > Load Boot File. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi I you want to spare yourself some setup headaches, take a USB crafted as a Ventoy or SG2D USB that contains KL ISO files, directly. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. It . Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. UEFi64? The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. Thnx again. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? eficompress infile outfile. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. You can use these commands to format it: if you want can you test this too :) 2. . Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso unsigned kernel still can not be booted. . Have a question about this project? And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. memz.mp4. Already on GitHub? Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. /s. 5. extservice I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. No. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. Any ideas? Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. privacy statement. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Thank you for your suggestions! The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. Ventoy 1.0.55 is available already for download. screenshots if possible Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. all give ERROR on my PC What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. MediCAT (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB 1. Is there any solution for this? () no boot file found for uefi. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. You can repair the drive or replace it. I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. check manjaro-gnome, not working. 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Unable to boot properly. Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. Rik. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ Does shim still needed in this case? Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. What system are you booting from? I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. @pbatard If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). Secure Boot is supported since Ventoy-1.0.07, please use the latest version and see the Notes. It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! Shim itself is signed with Microsoft key. Some modern systems are not compatible with Windows 7 UEFI64 (may hang) ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. My guesd is it does not. 2. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. Tested on ASUS K40IN Sorry for my ignorance. Error : @FadeMind The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. Error message: If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. @pbatard, have you tested it? My guess is it does not. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. Main Edition Support. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. Thank you both for your replies. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. Not associated with Microsoft. TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. P.S. So I apologise for that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. Option 2: bypass secure boot Have a question about this project? This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. - . So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. EDIT: Getting the same error as @rderooy. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. You signed in with another tab or window. But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. No! Ventoy can detect GRUB inside ISO file, parse its configuration file and load its boot elements directly, with "linux" GRUB kernel loading command. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it.

Which Of The Following Is Not Characteristic Of Neurons?, Articles V